Northern Ireland pupils to be awarded GCSE grades
based on teacher predictions Of qual model scrapped as ex-chief
inspector of schools says England should follow suit
GCSE students in Northern Ireland are to be
awarded the grades predicted by their teachers, Stormont’s education minister
has announced.
Days before the results are due to be published on
Thursday, Peter Weir has scrapped a plan that would have meant grades being
calculated using a mathematical model that took into account the past
performance of schools.
The major policy shift comes amid controversy in
England and Northern Ireland about the system used to allocate A-level grades.
On Monday the Sixth Form Colleges Association (SFCA)
analysed 65,000 exam entries in 41 A-level subjects and found the grades
awarded this year were lower on average in all of them compared with the
previous three years. On average, almost a fifth of students (19%) in
sixth-form colleges had been left with lower grades than they would have
received if they had sat their exams in previous years, the research found.
The
move by the Northern Ireland executive affects grades issued by the Northern
Ireland exams body, the Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment
(CCEA).
The CCEA accounts for 97% of all GCSEs taken in the
region. Students who were due to sit GCSEs set by awarding bodies in England
or Wales will still be graded according to the approach taken by those organisations.
The Northern Ireland assembly is set to be recalled
from summer recess to debate the furore caused by the standardisation formula
used for A-levels.
More than a third of A-level grades issued last
Thursday were lower than teacher estimates.
Weir’s move came as a former chief inspector of
schools in England said England should follow Northern Ireland and Scotland and
allow GCSE results to be solely based on grades predicted by teachers.
Sir Michael Wilshaw said that while he understood
concerns about grade inflation, children, particularly those from disadvantaged
backgrounds, had “suffered greatly” during the pandemic.
“If we err on the side of generosity now, no one will
blame the government for that and no one will blame Ofqual for that, this is an
exceptional year,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday.
Wilshaw described the exam results crisis in England
as “a terrible farce”, adding that it had “affected thousands of young people
whose expectations have been dashed and whose life chances have been affected”.
Although Ofqual had been “sitting on their hands” by
allowing the controversial algorithm upon which A-level results were based to
be used, “ultimately it’s the politicians who have to take responsibility”,
Wilshaw said.
“The great danger for Gavin Williamson [the
education secretary] at the moment, is that he’s losing the confidence of
headteachers around the country who’ve seen this happen,” he added.
The shadow education secretary, Kate Green, has also urged
the government to keep the option of awarding pupils their GCSE results based
on teacher-assessed grades on the table in England given the exceptional
circumstances and the huge disruption that had already occurred to their
education.
“It may be that if there’s no other fair method of
determining the GCSE results, we’ll have to look at that, keep that option on
the table for them too,” she told the Today programme.
On Thursday, GCSE results are due to be published for
more than 600,000 year 11 pupils in England and 100,000 older students aiming
for passes in maths and English that qualify them for further training or
study.
An analysis by leading researchers has warned that 2m
GCSE grades recommended by teachers could be downgraded, with disadvantaged
students worse hit than those affected by the A-levels debacle.
The SFCA’s chief executive, Bill Watkin, said:
“Ofqual should therefore immediately recalibrate and rerun the model to provide
all students with an accurate grade, and provide an assurance that this will be
no lower than the calculated grade they have already received. Should this
still fail to produce results that are broadly similar to previous years,
students should be awarded the grades predicted by teachers.”
Northern Ireland has so far resisted calls to void
the disputed results generated by the A-level algorithm and replace
them with teacher predictions. However, Weir has now taken that decision for
GCSEs.
The CCEA standardisation systems for A-levels and
GCSEs were different. While the A-level model took into account pupils’
previous exam results, the GCSE algorithm did not factor in any data from
students’ past academic performances.
Instead it used data related to the performance of
previous GCSE classes in the schools the pupils attended.
Critics of the process argued it would have been
highly unfair for pupils’ grades to be influenced by former GCSE students. Weir
said his decision would not delay the publication of grades on Thursday.
Northern
Ireland’s education minister, Peter Weir, has urged A-level and AS-level pupils
unhappy with their results to contact their school or college to work through
the appeals process. Photograph: NI Assembly broadcast/PA
“Having
received advice from CCEA and listened to the concerns of school leaders,
teachers, parents and young people, I have decided that all GCSE candidates
will now be awarded the grades submitted by their centre,” he said.
“Standardisation is normally a key feature of
awarding qualifications in Northern Ireland and across the UK. However, these
are exceptional circumstances and in exceptional times truly difficult
decisions are made. I am conscious that for GCSEs, unlike at A-level, we do not
have system level prior performance data for this group of young people.
“I want to encourage as many young people as possible
to remain in education or training post-16 and to know they have another
opportunity to engage with education. I am also mindful that unlike A-level,
many GCSE pupils will not have access to previous public examination outcomes
to inform any appeals process.”
Comments
Post a Comment